Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Darin Watson's avatar

This doesn't seem like a good trade to me. We gave up our best trade chip and didn't really fill a position of need. Even if Massey and India platoon, Massey would be getting more playing time as the LH batter (and you can't give up your top trade chip for a platoon player anyway). And the "sweetener" is another outfielder who can't hit? I thought we were fully stocked on those. If Massey doesn't have the arm for 3B, I'm not sure he has the arm for LF. That might not matter in Fenway, but I think it does at Kauffman.

Expand full comment
Charlie 319's avatar

I'm, lukewarm on India vs Singer. Even as a slightly mediocre starting option, he keeps the team in the game for the offense to win it. Also, we now have a Massey/Melendez problem. Might they be platooned? I haven't looked at the stats, but sooner or later, somebody is getting traded. Joey Weiner is indeed a Drew Waters clone. Except he bats right,and with more power, and Waters is ambidextrous but apparently hits better from the left. That could mean a platoon in right, where either can cover c.f. in case of injury. Weiner, like Waters, still has potential and the competition may bring it out in improved OBP and total bases.

Also, trading Singer opens the door to a Lorenzen signing, which maintains the rotation's depth and long relieving quality.

3b remains a hole in the batting order. Maikel can field tbe position, but .280 with 25+ homers is beyond him. I still think that converting a AAA catcher would serve that purpose. So would taking a flier on Yoan Moncada. Actually, doing both would be the way to address present and future needs.

So, with India at leadoff, who bats second? With the idea of Witt and the meat of the orderfacing "man on first and third" at bats...

Weiner may end up being what makes the trade a winner.

Expand full comment
28 more comments...

No posts